H265 doubles the compression for the same quality as h264. A 15% increase in quality would equate to roughly 42.5% reduction in bitrate. obviously not taking into account losses due to overhead. Our math seems to differ by 27.5%.
2Mb *1.15 = 2.3Mb ( 15 % increase quality)
2.3Mb / 2 = 1.15Mb ( Double compression efficiency for same quality)
(1 - (1.15/2))*100 = 42.5% (bitrate reduction in %)
My previous posts allocations would serve the needs you quoted.
2Mb *1.5 = 3Mb (50% increase quality)
3Mb / 2 = 1.5Mb (double compression efficiency for same quality)
(1 - (1.5/2) * 100 = 25% (bitrate reduction in %)
You would essentially get a LOT more quality for more bitrate reduction than you specified!
You could comfortably get 3 simultaneous *actual* 720p HD streams on a 6Mb plan.
Btw, I got a chuckle on the 4K support... really? 3840x2160 with a 2 or less Mb stream? that would look horrible in any codec.
Let's work on 1080P first
2Mb *1.15 = 2.3Mb ( 15 % increase quality)
2.3Mb / 2 = 1.15Mb ( Double compression efficiency for same quality)
(1 - (1.15/2))*100 = 42.5% (bitrate reduction in %)
My previous posts allocations would serve the needs you quoted.
2Mb *1.5 = 3Mb (50% increase quality)
3Mb / 2 = 1.5Mb (double compression efficiency for same quality)
(1 - (1.5/2) * 100 = 25% (bitrate reduction in %)
You would essentially get a LOT more quality for more bitrate reduction than you specified!
You could comfortably get 3 simultaneous *actual* 720p HD streams on a 6Mb plan.
Btw, I got a chuckle on the 4K support... really? 3840x2160 with a 2 or less Mb stream? that would look horrible in any codec.
Let's work on 1080P first

Comment